FNWB
Price
$9.72
Change
-$0.12 (-1.22%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
87.76M
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSVB
Price
$17.69
Change
+$0.19 (+1.09%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Capitalization
49.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNWB vs MSVB

Header iconFNWB vs MSVB Comparison
Open Charts FNWB vs MSVBBanner chart's image
First Northwest Ban
Price$9.72
Change-$0.12 (-1.22%)
Volume$26.36K
Capitalization87.76M
Mid-Southern Ban
Price$17.69
Change+$0.19 (+1.09%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization49.57M
FNWB vs MSVB Comparison Chart in %
FNWB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSVB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNWB vs. MSVB commentary
Nov 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWB is a StrongBuy and MSVB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FNWB: $9.81 vs. MSVB: $17.69)
Brand notoriety: FNWB and MSVB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNWB: 135% vs. MSVB: 40%
Market capitalization -- FNWB: $87.76M vs. MSVB: $49.57M
FNWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $87.76M. MSVB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $49.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNWB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSVB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNWB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSVB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSVB is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNWB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSVB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNWB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSVB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNWB is a better buy in the short-term than MSVB.

Price Growth

FNWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.62% price change this week, while MSVB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.79% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWB($87.8M) has a higher market cap than MSVB($49.6M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than MSVB: FNWB (43.38) vs MSVB (27.32). MSVB YTD gains are higher at: 18.260 vs. FNWB (-2.567). FNWB has more cash in the bank: 16.8M vs. MSVB (1.22M). MSVB has less debt than FNWB: MSVB (28.2M) vs FNWB (360M).
FNWBMSVBFNWB / MSVB
Capitalization87.8M49.6M177%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.56718.260-14%
P/E Ratio43.3827.32159%
Revenue65.2MN/A-
Total Cash16.8M1.22M1,373%
Total Debt360M28.2M1,277%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWB vs MSVB: Fundamental Ratings
FNWB
MSVB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10054
SMR RATING
1..100
8679
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
228
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSVB's Valuation (85) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (90). This means that MSVB’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

MSVB's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (100). This means that MSVB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

MSVB's SMR Rating (79) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (86). This means that MSVB’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MSVB (46). This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to MSVB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as MSVB (28). This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to MSVB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNWBMSVB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNWB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSVB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X90518.3700003176.468800
+3.64%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.630.57
+2.71%
GameStop Corp
TSLA426.587.18
+1.71%
Tesla
SPY679.684.66
+0.69%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL277.550.58
+0.21%
Apple

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with OZKAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then OZKAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
-0.41%
OZKAP - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
BKU - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
VLYPO - FNWB
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
TCBIO - FNWB
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
VLYPP - FNWB
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More