FNWB
Price
$10.36
Change
+$0.02 (+0.19%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
17 days until earnings call
PFS
Price
$17.83
Change
+$0.15 (+0.85%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
23 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FNWB vs PFS

Header iconFNWB vs PFS Comparison
Open Charts FNWB vs PFSBanner chart's image
First Northwest Ban
Price$10.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
Volume$20.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Provident Financial Services
Price$17.83
Change+$0.15 (+0.85%)
Volume$393.05K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FNWB vs PFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FNWB vs. PFS commentary
Oct 07, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWB is a StrongSell and PFS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2024
Stock price -- (FNWB: $10.36 vs. PFS: $17.83)
Brand notoriety: FNWB and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNWB: 98% vs. PFS: 48%
Market capitalization -- FNWB: $149.01M vs. PFS: $1.1B
FNWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $149.01M. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNWB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNWB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNWB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNWB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the short-term than FNWB.

Price Growth

FNWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.45% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($1.1B) has a higher market cap than FNWB($149M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than PFS: FNWB (60.69) vs PFS (8.49). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 3.449 vs. FNWB (-33.757). PFS has more cash in the bank: 189M vs. FNWB (20.6M). FNWB has less debt than PFS: FNWB (321M) vs PFS (1.46B). PFS has higher revenues than FNWB: PFS (479M) vs FNWB (65.5M).
FNWBPFSFNWB / PFS
Capitalization149M1.1B14%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-33.7573.449-979%
P/E Ratio60.698.49715%
Revenue65.5M479M14%
Total Cash20.6M189M11%
Total Debt321M1.46B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWB vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
FNWB
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7666
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6614
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNWB's Valuation (31) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (51). This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (100). This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (66). This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (63). This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (8). This means that FNWB’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNWBPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGRCX21.300.32
+1.53%
Loomis Sayles Growth C
DGYGX44.770.21
+0.47%
BNY Mellon Appreciation Y
PUGCX14.300.06
+0.42%
Putnam Focused International Equity C
RAMSX5.010.02
+0.40%
Roumell Opportunistic Value Instl
JABIX12.91-0.03
-0.23%
JHancock Real Estate Securities R6

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
+0.19%
WNEB - FNWB
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.27%
PFS - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
SYBT - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
NFBK - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
NIC - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
More

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
+0.85%
UBSI - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
TRST - PFS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
STBA - PFS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
SBCF - PFS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
ABCB - PFS
86%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
More