Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs FZEMX
FNWFX vs FZEMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs FZEMX
FNWFX vs FZEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FZEMX (11.5B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than FZEMX: FNWFX (1.24) vs FZEMX (0.05). FNWFX was incepted earlier than FZEMX: FNWFX (9 years) vs FZEMX (5 years). FZEMX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FZEMX (31.00). FZEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: FZEMX (0) vs FNWFX (1000000). FZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.12 vs. FNWFX (26.97). FZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 37.06 vs. FNWFX (16.53).
| FNWFX | FZEMX | FNWFX / FZEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.73 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.73 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.253 | 29.035 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 11.5B | 790% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.05 | 2,330% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.97 | 56.12 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.49 | 90.49 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.53 | 37.06 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement