Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs GIRPX
FNWFX vs GIRPX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs GIRPX
FNWFX vs GIRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. GIRPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and GIRPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. GIRPX (3.94B). GIRPX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: GIRPX (1.68) vs FNWFX (1.24). FNWFX was incepted earlier than GIRPX: FNWFX (9 years) vs GIRPX (16 years). GIRPX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). GIRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). GIRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: GIRPX (0) vs FNWFX (1000000). GIRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 58.28 vs. FNWFX (31.43). GIRPX return over 5 years is better than : 28.93 vs. FNWFX (21.16).
| FNWFX | GIRPX | FNWFX / GIRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.08 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.23 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.824 | 32.735 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 3.94B | 2,309% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.68 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.43 | 58.28 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.25 | 102.42 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.16 | 28.93 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 137.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers