Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs GLLAX
FNWFX vs GLLAX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs GLLAX
American Funds New World F3
Price$95.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China A
Price$14.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.58M
FNWFX vs GLLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. GLLAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and GLLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. GLLAX (165M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than GLLAX: FNWFX (1.06) vs GLLAX (0.27). FNWFX was incepted earlier than GLLAX: FNWFX (9 years) vs GLLAX (25 years). GLLAX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. GLLAX (35.00). GLLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: GLLAX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.23 vs. GLLAX (14.32). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.69 vs. GLLAX (9.64).
| FNWFX | GLLAX | FNWFX / GLLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.26 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.72 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.617 | 22.409 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.1B | 165M | 44,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.27 | 389% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.23 | 14.32 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.39 | 17.39 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.69 | 9.64 | 339% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement