Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs GLLAX
FNWFX vs GLLAX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs GLLAX
FNWFX vs GLLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. GLLAX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and GLLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. GLLAX (250M). FNWFX (1.24) and GLLAX (1.20) have matching dividends . FNWFX was incepted earlier than GLLAX: FNWFX (9 years) vs GLLAX (26 years). GLLAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GLLAX (27.00). GLLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: GLLAX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). GLLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 67.17 vs. FNWFX (22.19). GLLAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.99 vs. FNWFX (15.39).
| FNWFX | GLLAX | FNWFX / GLLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.27 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.60 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.502 | 40.128 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 250M | 36,360% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.20 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.19 | 67.17 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.54 | 101.43 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.39 | 30.99 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement