Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs GLLAX
FNWFX vs GLLAX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs GLLAX
FNWFX vs GLLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. GLLAX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a StrongBuy and GLLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. GLLAX (246M). GLLAX (1.29) and FNWFX (1.27) have matching dividends . FNWFX was incepted earlier than GLLAX: FNWFX (10 years) vs GLLAX (26 years). GLLAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GLLAX (27.00). GLLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: GLLAX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). GLLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.02 vs. FNWFX (21.01). GLLAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.49 vs. FNWFX (19.70).
| FNWFX | GLLAX | FNWFX / GLLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.27 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.60 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.593 | 39.169 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 246M | 36,016% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.29 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.01 | 62.02 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.96 | 102.59 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.70 | 24.49 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement