Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs GTDCX
FNWFX vs GTDCX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs GTDCX
FNWFX vs GTDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. GTDCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and GTDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. GTDCX (1.33B). GTDCX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: GTDCX (2.16) vs FNWFX (1.24). FNWFX was incepted earlier than GTDCX: FNWFX (9 years) vs GTDCX (27 years). GTDCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). GTDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). GTDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: GTDCX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). GTDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.05 vs. FNWFX (19.73). GTDCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.08 vs. FNWFX (14.94).
| FNWFX | GTDCX | FNWFX / GTDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.15 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.15 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.743 | 39.539 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 1.33B | 6,814% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 2.16 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.73 | 36.05 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.48 | 45.66 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.94 | 17.08 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement