Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs LZEMX
FNWFX vs LZEMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs LZEMX
FNWFX vs LZEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. LZEMX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a StrongBuy and LZEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. LZEMX (10B). LZEMX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: LZEMX (1.67) vs FNWFX (1.24). FNWFX was incepted earlier than LZEMX: FNWFX (10 years) vs LZEMX (32 years). LZEMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. LZEMX (27.00). LZEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: LZEMX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). LZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.96 vs. FNWFX (15.04). LZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 102.13 vs. FNWFX (17.91).
| FNWFX | LZEMX | FNWFX / LZEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.07 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.07 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.984 | 30.549 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 100000 | - |
| Net Assets | 90B | 10B | 900% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.67 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.04 | 42.96 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.74 | 112.23 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.91 | 102.13 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 148.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement