Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs MCECX
FNWFX vs MCECX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs MCECX
FNWFX vs MCECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. MCECX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and MCECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. MCECX (416M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than MCECX: FNWFX (1.24) vs MCECX (0.00). FNWFX was incepted earlier than MCECX: FNWFX (9 years) vs MCECX (8 years). MCECX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MCECX (25.00). MCECX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: MCECX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). MCECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.21 vs. FNWFX (19.73). MCECX return over 5 years is better than : 16.43 vs. FNWFX (14.94).
| FNWFX | MCECX | FNWFX / MCECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.98 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.98 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.743 | 22.290 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 416M | 21,803% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.73 | 47.21 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.48 | 59.87 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.94 | 16.43 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement