Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs RDWHX
FNWFX vs RDWHX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs RDWHX
FNWFX vs RDWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. RDWHX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and RDWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. RDWHX (2.64B). RDWHX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: RDWHX (1.61) vs FNWFX (1.27). FNWFX was incepted earlier than RDWHX: FNWFX (10 years) vs RDWHX (11 years). RDWHX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). RDWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). RDWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: RDWHX (250) vs FNWFX (1000000). RDWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.52 vs. FNWFX (20.21). RDWHX return over 5 years is better than : 33.01 vs. FNWFX (18.46).
| FNWFX | RDWHX | FNWFX / RDWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.92 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.94 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.456 | 16.942 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 2.64B | 3,356% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.61 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.21 | 29.52 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.08 | 67.44 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.46 | 33.01 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement