Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs SEKCX
FNWFX vs SEKCX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs SEKCX
FNWFX vs SEKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. SEKCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and SEKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SEKCX (84.5M). SEKCX (1.29) and FNWFX (1.24) have matching dividends . FNWFX was incepted earlier than SEKCX: FNWFX (9 years) vs SEKCX (25 years). SEKCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). SEKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). SEKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: SEKCX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). SEKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.27 vs. FNWFX (26.97). SEKCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.09 vs. FNWFX (16.53).
| FNWFX | SEKCX | FNWFX / SEKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.90 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.43 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.253 | 37.239 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 84.5M | 107,574% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.29 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.97 | 62.27 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.49 | 94.06 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.53 | 30.09 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 141.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement