Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs SEKCX
FNWFX vs SEKCX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs SEKCX
FNWFX vs SEKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. SEKCX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and SEKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. SEKCX (76.8M). SEKCX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: SEKCX (1.37) vs FNWFX (1.27). FNWFX was incepted earlier than SEKCX: FNWFX (10 years) vs SEKCX (25 years). SEKCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). SEKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). SEKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: SEKCX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). SEKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.01 vs. FNWFX (20.56). SEKCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.16 vs. FNWFX (19.48).
| FNWFX | SEKCX | FNWFX / SEKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.90 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.43 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.454 | 25.571 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.6B | 76.8M | 115,365% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.37 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.56 | 39.01 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.82 | 79.15 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.48 | 28.16 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement