Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs SEMGX
FNWFX vs SEMGX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs SEMGX
FNWFX vs SEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. SEMGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and SEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. SEMGX (84.5M). SEMGX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: SEMGX (2.32) vs FNWFX (1.24). FNWFX was incepted earlier than SEMGX: FNWFX (9 years) vs SEMGX (30 years). SEMGX (1.47) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). SEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). SEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: SEMGX (2500) vs FNWFX (1000000). SEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.54 vs. FNWFX (26.97). SEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.92 vs. FNWFX (16.53).
| FNWFX | SEMGX | FNWFX / SEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.98 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.47 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.253 | 36.110 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 84.5M | 107,574% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 2.32 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.97 | 61.54 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.49 | 97.04 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.53 | 35.92 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 161.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement