Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs TCEMX
FNWFX vs TCEMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs TCEMX
FNWFX vs TCEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. TCEMX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and TCEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. TCEMX (320M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than TCEMX: FNWFX (1.24) vs TCEMX (0.43). FNWFX was incepted earlier than TCEMX: FNWFX (9 years) vs TCEMX (20 years). TCEMX (2.76) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. TCEMX (16.75). TCEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: TCEMX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.78 vs. TCEMX (14.20). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.20 vs. TCEMX (2.78).
| FNWFX | TCEMX | FNWFX / TCEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.51 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.76 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.797 | 9.993 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6B | 320M | 26,750% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.43 | 291% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.78 | 14.20 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.21 | 38.11 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.20 | 2.78 | 727% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 45.03 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement