Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs TEMRX
FNWFX vs TEMRX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs TEMRX
FNWFX vs TEMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. TEMRX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and TEMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. TEMRX (1.77B). TEMRX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: TEMRX (2.70) vs FNWFX (1.24). FNWFX was incepted earlier than TEMRX: FNWFX (10 years) vs TEMRX (16 years). TEMRX (1.28) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). TEMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). TEMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: TEMRX (2500) vs FNWFX (1000000). TEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.93 vs. FNWFX (16.86). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.82 vs. TEMRX (12.63).
| FNWFX | TEMRX | FNWFX / TEMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.28 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.28 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.752 | 17.174 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90B | 1.77B | 5,085% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 2.70 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.86 | 24.93 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.76 | 72.38 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.82 | 12.63 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.02 | - |