Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs TRGZX
FNWFX vs TRGZX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs TRGZX
FNWFX vs TRGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. TRGZX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and TRGZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. TRGZX (7.38B). TRGZX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: TRGZX (1.52) vs FNWFX (1.24). FNWFX was incepted earlier than TRGZX: FNWFX (9 years) vs TRGZX (6 years). TRGZX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). TRGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.20 vs. FNWFX (46.00). TRGZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: TRGZX (0) vs FNWFX (1000000). TRGZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 65.79 vs. FNWFX (26.97). FNWFX (16.53) and TRGZX (16.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNWFX | TRGZX | FNWFX / TRGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.97 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.253 | 33.514 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 7.38B | 1,231% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.52 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.97 | 65.79 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.49 | 77.60 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.53 | 16.02 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers