Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs WAFMX
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World F3
Price$94.08
Change+$0.17 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.99B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.48M
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 73B vs. WAFMX (35.5M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: FNWFX (1.06) vs WAFMX (0.69). FNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: FNWFX (9 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). WAFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: WAFMX (2000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.97 vs. WAFMX (5.11). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.62 vs. WAFMX (29.49).
| FNWFX | WAFMX | FNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.20 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.38 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.150 | 11.304 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73B | 35.5M | 205,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.69 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.97 | 5.11 | 332% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.92 | 45.41 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.62 | 29.49 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement