Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs WAFMX
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World F3
Price$89.80
Change-$0.22 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.59B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.73
Change-$0.01 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.71M
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. WAFMX (35.7M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: FNWFX (1.10) vs WAFMX (0.71). FNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: FNWFX (9 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). WAFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: WAFMX (2000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.54 vs. WAFMX (9.54). WAFMX (27.05) and FNWFX (26.01) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNWFX | WAFMX | FNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.20 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.38 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.593 | 8.116 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.6B | 35.7M | 197,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.71 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.54 | 9.54 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.49 | 31.83 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.01 | 27.05 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.34 | - |