Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs WAFMX
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs WAFMX
American Funds New World F3
Price$89.59
Change+$0.23 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.13B
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs I
Price$3.84
Change+$0.02 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.42M
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and WAFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. WAFMX (37.4M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: FNWFX (1.09) vs WAFMX (0.68). FNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: FNWFX (8 years) vs WAFMX (13 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. WAFMX (28.00). WAFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: WAFMX (2000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.81 vs. WAFMX (8.70). WAFMX return over 5 years is better than : 35.10 vs. FNWFX (29.71).
| FNWFX | WAFMX | FNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.20 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.38 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.022 | 10.725 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.1B | 37.4M | 187,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.68 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.81 | 8.70 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.32 | 57.70 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.71 | 35.10 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement