Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs WAFMX
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs WAFMX
FNWFX vs WAFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. WAFMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and WAFMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. WAFMX (23.1M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than WAFMX: FNWFX (1.24) vs WAFMX (0.00). FNWFX was incepted earlier than WAFMX: FNWFX (9 years) vs WAFMX (14 years). WAFMX (2.38) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). WAFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). WAFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: WAFMX (2000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.73 vs. WAFMX (-1.32). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.94 vs. WAFMX (-10.23).
| FNWFX | WAFMX | FNWFX / WAFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.96 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.38 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.743 | 4.167 | 306% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.7B | 23.1M | 392,641% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.73 | -1.32 | -1,500% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.48 | 28.05 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.94 | -10.23 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement