Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs WBELX
FNWFX vs WBELX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs WBELX
FNWFX vs WBELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. WBELX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and WBELX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. WBELX (102M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than WBELX: FNWFX (1.24) vs WBELX (0.76). FNWFX was incepted earlier than WBELX: FNWFX (9 years) vs WBELX (18 years). WBELX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). WBELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). WBELX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: WBELX (500000) vs FNWFX (1000000). WBELX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.94 vs. FNWFX (29.78). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.20 vs. WBELX (0.81).
| FNWFX | WBELX | FNWFX / WBELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.99 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.27 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.797 | 17.256 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 500000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6B | 102M | 83,922% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.76 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.78 | 38.94 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.21 | 61.71 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.20 | 0.81 | 2,479% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement