Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs ZEMIX
FNWFX vs ZEMIX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs ZEMIX
FNWFX vs ZEMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. ZEMIX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and ZEMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. ZEMIX (343M). ZEMIX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: ZEMIX (1.46) vs FNWFX (1.24). FNWFX was incepted earlier than ZEMIX: FNWFX (9 years) vs ZEMIX (8 years). ZEMIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). ZEMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 198.00 vs. FNWFX (46.00). ZEMIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: ZEMIX (250000) vs FNWFX (1000000). ZEMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.77 vs. FNWFX (29.78). ZEMIX return over 5 years is better than : 28.69 vs. FNWFX (20.20).
| FNWFX | ZEMIX | FNWFX / ZEMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.86 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.12 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.797 | 32.824 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.6B | 343M | 24,956% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.46 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.78 | 43.77 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.21 | 89.99 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.20 | 28.69 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement