Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOBAX vs RLBAX
FOBAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FOBAX vs RLBAX
FOBAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOBAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOBAX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FOBAX (82.4M). FOBAX (1.18) and RLBAX (1.13) have matching dividends . FOBAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FOBAX (30 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). FOBAX (1.32) and RLBAX (1.32) have similar cost to investors . RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FOBAX (21.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBAX: RLBAX (250) vs FOBAX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.09 vs. FOBAX (1.77). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.60 vs. FOBAX (5.11).
| FOBAX | RLBAX | FOBAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.488 | 9.744 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.4M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.13 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.77 | 11.09 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.58 | 41.57 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.11 | 29.60 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.36 | 75.35 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement