Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOBAX vs RLBAX
FOBAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FOBAX vs RLBAX
FOBAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOBAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOBAX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FOBAX (80.9M). FOBAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FOBAX (1.20) vs RLBAX (1.14). FOBAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FOBAX (30 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). FOBAX (1.32) and RLBAX (1.32) have similar cost to investors . RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FOBAX (21.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBAX: RLBAX (250) vs FOBAX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.73 vs. FOBAX (0.89). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.44 vs. FOBAX (3.27).
| FOBAX | RLBAX | FOBAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.120 | 8.475 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.9M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.14 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.89 | 12.73 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.64 | 39.51 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.27 | 30.44 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.82 | 79.16 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement