Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOBAX vs RLBAX
FOBAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FOBAX vs RLBAX
FOBAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOBAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOBAX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FOBAX (82.5M). FOBAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FOBAX (1.20) vs RLBAX (1.14). FOBAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FOBAX (30 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). FOBAX (1.32) and RLBAX (1.32) have similar cost to investors . RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FOBAX (22.00). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBAX: RLBAX (250) vs FOBAX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.80 vs. FOBAX (4.74). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.17 vs. FOBAX (6.52).
| FOBAX | RLBAX | FOBAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.629 | 9.354 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 82.5M | 279B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.14 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.74 | 16.80 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.04 | 42.23 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.52 | 31.17 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.62 | 77.06 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement