Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOFRX vs MBGAX
FOFRX vs MBGAX Comparison
Open Charts FOFRX vs MBGAX
FOFRX vs MBGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights
Market Cap
The average market capitalization across the group is 454.96M. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 134.52M to 775.41M. FOFRX holds the highest valuation in this group at 775.41M. The lowest valued company is MBGAX at 134.52M.
High and low price notable news
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1%. FOFRX experienced the highest price growth at -1%, while MBGAX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.
Volume
The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
FOFRX vs. MBGAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOFRX is a Hold and MBGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFRX has more cash in the bank: 774M vs. MBGAX (135M). FOFRX pays higher dividends than MBGAX: FOFRX (3.78) vs MBGAX (2.54). FOFRX was incepted earlier than MBGAX: FOFRX (9 years) vs MBGAX (33 years). MBGAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FOFRX (0.53). FOFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.43 vs. MBGAX (13.00). MBGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOFRX: MBGAX (1000) vs FOFRX (1000000). FOFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.40 vs. MBGAX (3.91). FOFRX return over 5 years is better than : -2.41 vs. MBGAX (-3.70).
| FOFRX | MBGAX | FOFRX / MBGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.65 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.74 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.193 | -1.026 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 774M | 135M | 573% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.78 | 2.54 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 3.91 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.74 | 7.46 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.41 | -3.70 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers