Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOFRX vs MCNCX
FOFRX vs MCNCX Comparison
Open Charts FOFRX vs MCNCX
FOFRX vs MCNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOFRX vs. MCNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOFRX is a Hold and MCNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFRX has more cash in the bank: 774M vs. MCNCX (557M). FOFRX pays higher dividends than MCNCX: FOFRX (3.78) vs MCNCX (2.65). FOFRX was incepted earlier than MCNCX: FOFRX (9 years) vs MCNCX (33 years). MCNCX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FOFRX (0.53). FOFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.43 vs. MCNCX (6.00). MCNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOFRX: MCNCX (1000) vs FOFRX (1000000). FOFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.40 vs. MCNCX (3.53). FOFRX return over 5 years is better than : -2.41 vs. MCNCX (-3.56).
| FOFRX | MCNCX | FOFRX / MCNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.59 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.61 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.193 | -1.079 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 774M | 557M | 139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.78 | 2.65 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 3.53 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.74 | 7.41 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.41 | -3.56 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement