Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOFRX vs MCNCX
FOFRX vs MCNCX Comparison
Open Charts FOFRX vs MCNCX
FOFRX vs MCNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOFRX vs. MCNCX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOFRX is a Hold and MCNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFRX has more cash in the bank: 817M vs. MCNCX (578M). FOFRX pays higher dividends than MCNCX: FOFRX (3.64) vs MCNCX (2.56). FOFRX was incepted earlier than MCNCX: FOFRX (9 years) vs MCNCX (33 years). MCNCX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FOFRX (0.53). FOFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.43 vs. MCNCX (6.00). MCNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOFRX: MCNCX (1000) vs FOFRX (1000000). FOFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. MCNCX (6.81). FOFRX return over 5 years is better than : 0.26 vs. MCNCX (-0.14).
| FOFRX | MCNCX | FOFRX / MCNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.59 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.61 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.339 | 2.187 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 817M | 578M | 141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.64 | 2.56 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.43 | 6.81 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.18 | 9.59 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.26 | -0.14 | -190% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers