Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOFRX vs MLALX
FOFRX vs MLALX Comparison
Open Charts FOFRX vs MLALX
FOFRX vs MLALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOFRX vs. MLALX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOFRX is a Hold and MLALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFRX has more cash in the bank: 817M vs. MLALX (72.3M). FOFRX pays higher dividends than MLALX: FOFRX (3.64) vs MLALX (3.46). FOFRX was incepted earlier than MLALX: FOFRX (9 years) vs MLALX (10 years). MLALX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FOFRX (0.53). FOFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.43 vs. MLALX (14.00). MLALX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOFRX: MLALX (0) vs FOFRX (1000000). MLALX (7.78) and FOFRX (7.43) have marching annual gain over last year. MLALX return over 5 years is better than : 3.65 vs. FOFRX (0.26).
| FOFRX | MLALX | FOFRX / MLALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.65 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.83 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.339 | 2.577 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 817M | 72.3M | 1,130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.64 | 3.46 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.43 | 7.78 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.18 | 13.02 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.26 | 3.65 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers