Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOFRX vs MLALX
FOFRX vs MLALX Comparison
Open Charts FOFRX vs MLALX
FOFRX vs MLALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOFRX vs. MLALX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOFRX is a Hold and MLALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFRX has more cash in the bank: 774M vs. MLALX (69.1M). FOFRX pays higher dividends than MLALX: FOFRX (3.78) vs MLALX (3.57). FOFRX was incepted earlier than MLALX: FOFRX (9 years) vs MLALX (10 years). MLALX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FOFRX (0.53). FOFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.43 vs. MLALX (14.00). MLALX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOFRX: MLALX (0) vs FOFRX (1000000). MLALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. FOFRX (4.40). MLALX return over 5 years is better than : 0.28 vs. FOFRX (-2.41).
| FOFRX | MLALX | FOFRX / MLALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.66 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.86 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.193 | -0.373 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 774M | 69.1M | 1,120% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.78 | 3.57 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 4.65 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.74 | 11.05 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.41 | 0.28 | -870% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement