Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOKFX vs RGEBX
FOKFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FOKFX vs RGEBX
FOKFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOKFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOKFX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FOKFX (3.71B). FOKFX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FOKFX (0.02) vs RGEBX (0.00). FOKFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FOKFX (7 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FOKFX (0.50). FOKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FOKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FOKFX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FOKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.46 vs. RGEBX (11.13). FOKFX return over 5 years is better than : 92.64 vs. RGEBX (15.42).
| FOKFX | RGEBX | FOKFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.08 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.08 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.157 | 8.479 | 308% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.71B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.46 | 11.13 | 426% |
| Returns for 3 years | 109.81 | 45.29 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.64 | 15.42 | 601% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement