Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSCX vs NAESX
FOSCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FOSCX vs NAESX
FOSCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSCX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSCX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FOSCX (621M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FOSCX: NAESX (1.09) vs FOSCX (0.20). FOSCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FOSCX (30 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FOSCX (1.40) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FOSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOSCX: NAESX (0) vs FOSCX (1000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. FOSCX (11.50). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. FOSCX (-3.40).
| FOSCX | NAESX | FOSCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.17 | 688% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.17 | 824% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.423 | 12.982 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 621M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.09 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.50 | 13.09 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.76 | 49.57 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.40 | 32.77 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.40 | 152.60 | 25% |