Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSFX vs RERAX
FOSFX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FOSFX vs RERAX
FOSFX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSFX vs. RERAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSFX is a Hold and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FOSFX (7.49B). RERAX pays higher dividends than FOSFX: RERAX (2.21) vs FOSFX (1.62). FOSFX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FOSFX (42 years) vs RERAX (24 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FOSFX (0.67). FOSFX (50.00) and RERAX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FOSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FOSFX (0) vs RERAX (250). RERAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.73 vs. FOSFX (1.89). FOSFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.30 vs. RERAX (-9.17).
| FOSFX | RERAX | FOSFX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.57 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.57 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.984 | 5.861 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.49B | 140B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 2.21 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | 2.73 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.59 | 23.54 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.30 | -9.17 | -134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.23 | 38.30 | 243% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement