Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSFX vs RERAX
FOSFX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FOSFX vs RERAX
FOSFX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSFX vs. RERAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSFX is a Hold and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FOSFX (7.68B). RERAX pays higher dividends than FOSFX: RERAX (2.19) vs FOSFX (1.65). FOSFX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FOSFX (42 years) vs RERAX (24 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FOSFX (0.67). FOSFX (50.00) and RERAX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FOSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FOSFX (0) vs RERAX (250). RERAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.16 vs. FOSFX (10.79). FOSFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.32 vs. RERAX (-6.73).
| FOSFX | RERAX | FOSFX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.57 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.57 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.885 | 6.164 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.68B | 143B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 2.19 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 12.16 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.26 | 22.23 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.32 | -6.73 | -391% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.49 | 51.71 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement