Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSFX vs RERAX
FOSFX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FOSFX vs RERAX
FOSFX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSFX vs. RERAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSFX is a Hold and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 141B vs. FOSFX (7.88B). RERAX pays higher dividends than FOSFX: RERAX (2.25) vs FOSFX (1.61). FOSFX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FOSFX (42 years) vs RERAX (24 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FOSFX (0.67). FOSFX (50.00) and RERAX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FOSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FOSFX (0) vs RERAX (250). FOSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.67 vs. RERAX (3.67). FOSFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.78 vs. RERAX (-10.37).
| FOSFX | RERAX | FOSFX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.57 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.57 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.275 | 1.693 | 371% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.88B | 141B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 2.25 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.67 | 3.67 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.15 | 12.38 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.78 | -10.37 | -200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.16 | 36.08 | 280% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement