Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOSFX vs RERCX
FOSFX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts FOSFX vs RERCX
FOSFX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOSFX vs. RERCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSFX is a Hold and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FOSFX (7.49B). RERCX pays higher dividends than FOSFX: RERCX (2.38) vs FOSFX (1.62). FOSFX was incepted earlier than RERCX: FOSFX (42 years) vs RERCX (24 years). RERCX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FOSFX (0.67). FOSFX (50.00) and RERCX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FOSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERCX: FOSFX (0) vs RERCX (250). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.80 vs. FOSFX (1.89). FOSFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.30 vs. RERCX (-6.43).
| FOSFX | RERCX | FOSFX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.12 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.12 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 42 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.984 | 6.467 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.49B | 140B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 2.38 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.89 | 3.80 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.59 | 26.39 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.30 | -6.43 | -191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.23 | 44.13 | 211% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement