Analysis and predictions FOSL vs LANV
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSL is a Hold and LANV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FOSL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLANV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FOSL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LANV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FOSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FOSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FOSL (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -0.74% price change this week, while LANV (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +14.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
FOSL is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2024.
LANV is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2022.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.26% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| FOSL | LANV | FOSL / LANV | |
| Capitalization | 53.5M | 180M | 30% |
| EBITDA | -115.26M | -179.54M | 64% |
| Gain YTD | -45.075 | -38.305 | 118% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.78 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.41B | 435M | 325% |
| Total Cash | 117M | 30.8M | 380% |
| Total Debt | 389M | 188M | 207% |
FOSL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FOSL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
FOSL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOSL has been loosely correlated with MOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOSL jumps, then MOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOSL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOSL | 100% | +3.10% | ||
| MOV - FOSL | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| SIG - FOSL | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.12% | ||
| JEWL - FOSL | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.57% | ||
| TPR - FOSL | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
| LANV - FOSL | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
More | ||||
LANV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LANV and BGI have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LANV and BGI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LANV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LANV | 100% | +1.11% | ||
| BGI - LANV | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
| MYTE - LANV | 9% Poorly correlated | +5.36% | ||
| CPRI - LANV | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| MOV - LANV | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| JEWL - LANV | 2% Poorly correlated | -5.57% | ||
More | ||||