Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FOSL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJEWL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FOSL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JEWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FOSL (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -7.02% price change this week, while JEWL (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was -15.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.93%.
FOSL is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2024.
JEWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2023.
‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
FOSL | JEWL | FOSL / JEWL | |
Capitalization | 53.5M | 11.8M | 453% |
EBITDA | -115.26M | -15.18M | 759% |
Gain YTD | -46.726 | -50.820 | 92% |
P/E Ratio | 22.78 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.41B | 2.14M | 65,858% |
Total Cash | 117M | 906K | 12,914% |
Total Debt | 389M | 1.85M | 21,084% |
FOSL | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FOSL | JEWL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago79% | 9 days ago90% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 3 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOSL has been loosely correlated with MOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOSL jumps, then MOV could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FOSL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FOSL | 100% | -0.22% | ||
MOV - FOSL | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
SIG - FOSL | 31% Poorly correlated | -4.02% | ||
JEWL - FOSL | 22% Poorly correlated | +7.07% | ||
TPR - FOSL | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.59% | ||
LANV - FOSL | 18% Poorly correlated | +19.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that JEWL and FOSL have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JEWL and FOSL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JEWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
JEWL | 100% | +7.07% | ||
FOSL - JEWL | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
MYTE - JEWL | 17% Poorly correlated | -9.05% | ||
CTHR - JEWL | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
REAL - JEWL | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
LANV - JEWL | 5% Poorly correlated | +19.21% | ||
More |