Ad is loading...
FOTKX vs FSNKX
FOTKX vs FSNKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOTKX vs. FSNKX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOTKX is a Hold and FSNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOTKX (3.11B) and FSNKX (3.11B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FOTKX pays higher dividends than FSNKX: FOTKX (3.25) vs FSNKX (2.98). FOTKX was incepted earlier than FSNKX: FOTKX (8 years) vs FSNKX (8 years). FSNKX (0.43) is less costly to investors than FOTKX (0.25). FOTKX (13.00) and FSNKX (13.00) have comparable annual turnover. FOTKX (0) and FSNKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FOTKX (7.66) and FSNKX (7.51) have marching annual gain over last year. FOTKX return over 5 years is better than : 8.57 vs. FSNKX (8.02).
| FOTKX | FSNKX | FOTKX / FSNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.43 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.43 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.531 | 2.443 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.11B | 3.11B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 2.98 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 7.51 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.43 | 8.96 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.57 | 8.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |