Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs GMARX
FPACX vs GMARX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs GMARX
FPACX vs GMARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. GMARX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Buy and GMARX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. GMARX (934M). GMARX pays higher dividends than FPACX: GMARX (3.82) vs FPACX (2.56). FPACX was incepted earlier than GMARX: FPACX (33 years) vs GMARX (23 years). GMARX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FPACX (1.09). GMARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.63 vs. FPACX (23.00). GMARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPACX: GMARX (0) vs FPACX (1500). GMARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.78 vs. FPACX (9.92). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.37 vs. GMARX (8.02).
| FPACX | GMARX | FPACX / GMARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.16 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.16 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.829 | 12.878 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 934M | 1,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 3.82 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.92 | 12.78 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.09 | 23.27 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.37 | 8.02 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.26 | 24.55 | 241% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement