Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs GMARX
FPACX vs GMARX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs GMARX
FPACX vs GMARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. GMARX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and GMARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. GMARX (900M). GMARX pays higher dividends than FPACX: GMARX (3.82) vs FPACX (2.62). FPACX was incepted earlier than GMARX: FPACX (33 years) vs GMARX (23 years). GMARX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FPACX (1.09). GMARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.63 vs. FPACX (23.00). GMARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPACX: GMARX (0) vs FPACX (1500). GMARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.42 vs. FPACX (5.44). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 21.90 vs. GMARX (5.27).
| FPACX | GMARX | FPACX / GMARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.16 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.16 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.214 | 8.978 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 900M | 1,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 3.82 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 10.42 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.39 | 16.79 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.90 | 5.27 | 415% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.54 | 22.23 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement