Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs GMARX
FPACX vs GMARX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs GMARX
FPACX vs GMARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. GMARX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a StrongBuy and GMARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. GMARX (913M). GMARX pays higher dividends than FPACX: GMARX (3.75) vs FPACX (2.53). FPACX was incepted earlier than GMARX: FPACX (33 years) vs GMARX (23 years). GMARX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FPACX (1.09). GMARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.63 vs. FPACX (23.00). GMARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPACX: GMARX (0) vs FPACX (1500). GMARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. FPACX (6.32). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.75 vs. GMARX (6.74).
| FPACX | GMARX | FPACX / GMARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.16 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.16 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.107 | 11.541 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 913M | 1,413% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.75 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | 10.50 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.14 | 22.91 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.75 | 6.74 | 353% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.09 | 24.98 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement