Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs GMIAX
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs GMIAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$10.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets896.4M
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. GMIAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and GMIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. GMIAX (896M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPACX: GMIAX (2.59) vs FPACX (1.89). FPACX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPACX (32 years) vs GMIAX (21 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPACX (10.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMIAX: FPACX (1500) vs GMIAX (1000000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. GMIAX (-2.29). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.79 vs. GMIAX (20.04).
| FPACX | GMIAX | FPACX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.50 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.50 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.830 | 12.186 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 896M | 1,295% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 2.59 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.24 | -2.29 | -316% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.66 | 20.92 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.79 | 20.04 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.53 | 17.27 | 246% |