Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs GMIAX
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs GMIAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$9.68
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets906.33M
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. GMIAX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a StrongBuy and GMIAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. GMIAX (906M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPACX: GMIAX (2.75) vs FPACX (2.00). FPACX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPACX (32 years) vs GMIAX (21 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPACX (10.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMIAX: FPACX (1500) vs GMIAX (1000000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. GMIAX (-1.36). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 48.58 vs. GMIAX (28.73).
| FPACX | GMIAX | FPACX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.50 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.50 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.466 | 6.943 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 906M | 1,192% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 2.75 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.31 | -1.36 | -536% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.73 | 18.87 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.58 | 28.73 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.69 | 8.77 | 418% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement