Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs GMIAX
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs GMIAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$9.99
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.65M
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. GMIAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Buy and GMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. GMIAX (904M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPACX: GMIAX (2.74) vs FPACX (1.98). FPACX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPACX (32 years) vs GMIAX (21 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPACX (10.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMIAX: FPACX (1500) vs GMIAX (1000000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.12 vs. GMIAX (-1.24). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 44.46 vs. GMIAX (22.32).
| FPACX | GMIAX | FPACX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.50 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.50 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.606 | 10.378 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 904M | 1,250% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.74 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | -1.24 | -819% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.34 | 18.30 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.46 | 22.32 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.89 | 17.95 | 261% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement