Ad is loading...
FPACX vs GMIAX
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs GMIAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$9.07
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets866.21M
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. GMIAX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a StrongBuy and GMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. GMIAX (866M). FPACX (2.94) and GMIAX (2.85) have matching dividends . FPACX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPACX (32 years) vs GMIAX (20 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPACX (10.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMIAX: FPACX (1500) vs GMIAX (1000000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.68 vs. GMIAX (-5.63). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.44 vs. GMIAX (30.28).
| FPACX | GMIAX | FPACX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.50 | 212% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.50 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.846 | -0.110 | -765% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 866M | 1,189% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.94 | 2.85 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | -5.63 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.66 | 7.60 | 351% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.44 | 30.28 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.32 | -0.30 | -8,307% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...