Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs GMIAX
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs GMIAX
FPACX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. GMIAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and GMIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. GMIAX (900M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPACX: GMIAX (4.11) vs FPACX (2.62). FPACX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPACX (33 years) vs GMIAX (22 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.52). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.63 vs. FPACX (23.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMIAX: FPACX (1500) vs GMIAX (1000000). GMIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. FPACX (5.44). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 21.90 vs. GMIAX (9.84).
| FPACX | GMIAX | FPACX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.52 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.52 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.214 | 9.325 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 900M | 1,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 4.11 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | 11.31 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.39 | 20.28 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.90 | 9.84 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.54 | 32.49 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement