Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs NDMSX
FPACX vs NDMSX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs NDMSX
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv Svc
Price$9.95
Change+$0.03 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.65M
FPACX vs NDMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. NDMSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Buy and NDMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. NDMSX (904M). NDMSX pays higher dividends than FPACX: NDMSX (2.46) vs FPACX (1.98). FPACX was incepted earlier than NDMSX: FPACX (32 years) vs NDMSX (25 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NDMSX (0.90). NDMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPACX (10.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDMSX: FPACX (1500) vs NDMSX (50000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.12 vs. NDMSX (-1.54). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 44.46 vs. NDMSX (20.07).
| FPACX | NDMSX | FPACX / NDMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.90 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.90 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.606 | 10.195 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 50000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 904M | 1,250% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.98 | 2.46 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | -1.54 | -656% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.34 | 16.93 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.46 | 20.07 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.89 | 14.62 | 321% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement