Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs NDMSX
FPACX vs NDMSX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs NDMSX
FPACX vs NDMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. NDMSX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Buy and NDMSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. NDMSX (934M). NDMSX pays higher dividends than FPACX: NDMSX (3.76) vs FPACX (2.56). FPACX was incepted earlier than NDMSX: FPACX (33 years) vs NDMSX (26 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NDMSX (0.92). NDMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.63 vs. FPACX (23.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDMSX: FPACX (1500) vs NDMSX (50000). NDMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.33 vs. FPACX (9.92). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.37 vs. NDMSX (10.62).
| FPACX | NDMSX | FPACX / NDMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.92 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.92 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.829 | 13.016 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 50000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 934M | 1,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 3.76 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.92 | 13.33 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.09 | 25.63 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.37 | 10.62 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.26 | 30.71 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement