Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs NWWIX
FPACX vs NWWIX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs NWWIX
FPACX vs NWWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. NWWIX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Buy and NWWIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. NWWIX (934M). NWWIX pays higher dividends than FPACX: NWWIX (4.04) vs FPACX (2.56). FPACX was incepted earlier than NWWIX: FPACX (33 years) vs NWWIX (12 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NWWIX (0.62). NWWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.63 vs. FPACX (23.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWWIX: FPACX (1500) vs NWWIX (50000). NWWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.33 vs. FPACX (9.92). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.37 vs. NWWIX (13.06).
| FPACX | NWWIX | FPACX / NWWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.62 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.829 | 13.925 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 50000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 934M | 1,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 4.04 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.92 | 14.33 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.09 | 27.40 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.37 | 13.06 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.26 | 35.51 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement