Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs RPFCX
FPACX vs RPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs RPFCX
FPACX vs RPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. RPFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and RPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. RPFCX (315M). FPACX pays higher dividends than RPFCX: FPACX (2.39) vs RPFCX (1.47). FPACX was incepted earlier than RPFCX: FPACX (33 years) vs RPFCX (34 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RPFCX (0.98). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. RPFCX (12.00). RPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPACX: RPFCX (1000) vs FPACX (1500). RPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.25 vs. FPACX (10.11). RPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.41 vs. FPACX (19.97).
| FPACX | RPFCX | FPACX / RPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.98 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.98 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.708 | 9.771 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 315M | 3,937% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 1.47 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 19.25 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.59 | 53.84 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.97 | 47.41 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.97 | 150.57 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement