Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs RPFCX
FPACX vs RPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs RPFCX
FPACX vs RPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. RPFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a StrongBuy and RPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. RPFCX (335M). FPACX pays higher dividends than RPFCX: FPACX (2.53) vs RPFCX (1.40). FPACX was incepted earlier than RPFCX: FPACX (33 years) vs RPFCX (34 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RPFCX (0.98). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. RPFCX (12.00). RPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPACX: RPFCX (1000) vs FPACX (1500). RPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.44 vs. FPACX (4.84). RPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.10 vs. FPACX (22.50).
| FPACX | RPFCX | FPACX / RPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.98 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.98 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.011 | 13.633 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 335M | 3,791% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 1.40 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.84 | 15.44 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.27 | 53.20 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.50 | 49.10 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.69 | 149.61 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers