Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs RPFCX
FPACX vs RPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs RPFCX
FPACX vs RPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. RPFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and RPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. RPFCX (321M). FPACX pays higher dividends than RPFCX: FPACX (2.62) vs RPFCX (1.43). FPACX was incepted earlier than RPFCX: FPACX (33 years) vs RPFCX (34 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RPFCX (0.98). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. RPFCX (12.00). RPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPACX: RPFCX (1000) vs FPACX (1500). RPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.01 vs. FPACX (8.34). RPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.15 vs. FPACX (23.52).
| FPACX | RPFCX | FPACX / RPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.98 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.98 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.636 | 11.845 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 321M | 3,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 1.43 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.34 | 18.01 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 51.81 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.52 | 48.15 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.53 | 147.91 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers