Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs TGIPX
FPACX vs TGIPX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs TGIPX
FPACX vs TGIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. TGIPX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and TGIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. TGIPX (4.26B). FPACX pays higher dividends than TGIPX: FPACX (2.53) vs TGIPX (1.65). FPACX was incepted earlier than TGIPX: FPACX (33 years) vs TGIPX (11 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than TGIPX (0.77). TGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FPACX (23.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGIPX: FPACX (1500) vs TGIPX (500000). TGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. FPACX (3.70). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.04 vs. TGIPX (9.82).
| FPACX | TGIPX | FPACX / TGIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.63 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.77 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.405 | 10.101 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 4.26B | 298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 1.65 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.70 | 8.22 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.91 | 41.35 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.04 | 9.82 | 235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.29 | 82.47 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement