Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs TGIPX
FPACX vs TGIPX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs TGIPX
FPACX vs TGIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. TGIPX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a StrongBuy and TGIPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. TGIPX (4.37B). FPACX pays higher dividends than TGIPX: FPACX (2.56) vs TGIPX (1.69). FPACX was incepted earlier than TGIPX: FPACX (33 years) vs TGIPX (10 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than TGIPX (0.77). TGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FPACX (23.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGIPX: FPACX (1500) vs TGIPX (500000). TGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.36 vs. FPACX (9.25). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 24.83 vs. TGIPX (11.61).
| FPACX | TGIPX | FPACX / TGIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.63 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.77 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.202 | 11.769 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 4.37B | 298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 1.69 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.25 | 12.36 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.93 | 44.48 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.83 | 11.61 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.50 | 84.48 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement