Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs TGIPX
FPACX vs TGIPX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs TGIPX
FPACX vs TGIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. TGIPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and TGIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. TGIPX (4.32B). FPACX pays higher dividends than TGIPX: FPACX (2.39) vs TGIPX (1.68). FPACX was incepted earlier than TGIPX: FPACX (33 years) vs TGIPX (10 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than TGIPX (0.77). TGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.60 vs. FPACX (23.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGIPX: FPACX (1500) vs TGIPX (500000). TGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.72 vs. FPACX (10.11). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 19.97 vs. TGIPX (12.07).
| FPACX | TGIPX | FPACX / TGIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.63 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.77 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.708 | 9.514 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 4.32B | 287% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 1.68 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 16.72 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.59 | 42.22 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.97 | 12.07 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.97 | 93.53 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement