Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs TGIPX
FPACX vs TGIPX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs TGIPX
FPACX vs TGIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. TGIPX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and TGIPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. TGIPX (4.33B). FPACX pays higher dividends than TGIPX: FPACX (2.39) vs TGIPX (1.68). FPACX was incepted earlier than TGIPX: FPACX (33 years) vs TGIPX (10 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than TGIPX (0.77). TGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.60 vs. FPACX (23.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGIPX: FPACX (1500) vs TGIPX (500000). TGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.44 vs. FPACX (10.97). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 17.34 vs. TGIPX (12.53).
| FPACX | TGIPX | FPACX / TGIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.63 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.77 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.128 | 9.279 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 4.33B | 289% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 1.68 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.97 | 16.44 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.16 | 42.86 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.34 | 12.53 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.79 | 86.39 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement