Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs WSBFX
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs WSBFX
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$23.44
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.7M
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. WSBFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Buy and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. WSBFX (155M). FPACX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPACX (1.92) vs WSBFX (1.28). FPACX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPACX (32 years) vs WSBFX (26 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.95). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. WSBFX (3.30). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: FPACX (1500) vs WSBFX (100000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. WSBFX (2.56). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.90 vs. WSBFX (17.29).
| FPACX | WSBFX | FPACX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.95 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.95 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.329 | 5.206 | 237% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 155M | 7,548% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.28 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.64 | 2.56 | 454% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.77 | 12.46 | 343% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.90 | 17.29 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.11 | 66.74 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers