Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs WSBFX
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs WSBFX
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$22.14
Change-$0.23 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.51M
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. WSBFX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Buy and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. WSBFX (153M). FPACX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPACX (3.02) vs WSBFX (1.34). FPACX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPACX (32 years) vs WSBFX (26 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.95). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. WSBFX (3.30). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: FPACX (1500) vs WSBFX (100000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.48 vs. WSBFX (0.40). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 44.70 vs. WSBFX (20.76).
| FPACX | WSBFX | FPACX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.95 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.95 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.393 | 0.404 | 1,583% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 153M | 7,059% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 1.34 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.48 | 0.40 | 1,377% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.31 | 11.73 | 309% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.70 | 20.76 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.80 | 53.78 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers