Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs WSBFX
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs WSBFX
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. WSBFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and WSBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. WSBFX (141M). FPACX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPACX (2.39) vs WSBFX (1.13). FPACX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPACX (33 years) vs WSBFX (27 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.94). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. WSBFX (13.34). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: FPACX (1500) vs WSBFX (100000). WSBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.75 vs. FPACX (10.11). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 19.97 vs. WSBFX (7.97).
| FPACX | WSBFX | FPACX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.708 | 6.526 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 141M | 8,794% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 1.13 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 11.75 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.59 | 14.15 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.97 | 7.97 | 251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.97 | 75.87 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement