Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs WSBFX
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs WSBFX
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. WSBFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Hold and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. WSBFX (142M). FPACX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPACX (2.62) vs WSBFX (1.10). FPACX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPACX (33 years) vs WSBFX (27 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.94). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. WSBFX (13.34). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: FPACX (1500) vs WSBFX (100000). WSBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.35 vs. FPACX (8.34). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.52 vs. WSBFX (5.09).
| FPACX | WSBFX | FPACX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.636 | 7.315 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 142M | 8,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 1.10 | 238% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.34 | 9.35 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 12.30 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.52 | 5.09 | 462% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.53 | 70.16 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers