Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs WSBFX
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs WSBFX
FPACX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. WSBFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a Buy and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. WSBFX (142M). FPACX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPACX (2.56) vs WSBFX (1.11). FPACX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPACX (33 years) vs WSBFX (27 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.94). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. WSBFX (13.34). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: FPACX (1500) vs WSBFX (100000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. WSBFX (9.11). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 24.32 vs. WSBFX (4.41).
| FPACX | WSBFX | FPACX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.011 | 7.403 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 142M | 8,944% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 1.11 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.82 | 9.11 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.70 | 10.97 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.32 | 4.41 | 552% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.88 | 71.16 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers