Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPADX vs RNWFX
FPADX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FPADX vs RNWFX
FPADX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPADX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPADX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FPADX (15.6B). FPADX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: FPADX (1.88) vs RNWFX (1.20). FPADX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FPADX (15 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). RNWFX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FPADX (0.07). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FPADX (4.00). FPADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FPADX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FPADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.46 vs. RNWFX (31.39). FPADX return over 5 years is better than : 48.25 vs. RNWFX (20.98).
| FPADX | RNWFX | FPADX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.62 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.62 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.751 | 18.794 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.6B | 90.9B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.20 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.46 | 31.39 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.33 | 58.06 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.25 | 20.98 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.57 | 135.60 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers