Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPADX vs RNWFX
FPADX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FPADX vs RNWFX
FPADX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPADX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPADX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. FPADX (14.8B). FPADX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: FPADX (1.99) vs RNWFX (1.20). FPADX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FPADX (15 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). RNWFX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FPADX (0.07). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FPADX (4.00). FPADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FPADX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FPADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.07 vs. RNWFX (20.65). FPADX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. RNWFX (17.11).
| FPADX | RNWFX | FPADX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.62 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.62 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.611 | 16.196 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 88.6B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.20 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.07 | 20.65 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.46 | 52.29 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.42 | 17.11 | 265% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.61 | 109.95 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement