Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPADX vs RNWHX
FPADX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FPADX vs RNWHX
FPADX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPADX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPADX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FPADX (15.6B). FPADX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: FPADX (1.88) vs RNWHX (1.15). FPADX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FPADX (15 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). RNWHX (0.72) is less costly to investors than FPADX (0.07). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FPADX (4.00). FPADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FPADX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FPADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.46 vs. RNWHX (31.15). FPADX return over 5 years is better than : 48.25 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| FPADX | RNWHX | FPADX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.72 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.72 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.751 | 18.743 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.6B | 90.9B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.15 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.46 | 31.15 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.33 | 57.37 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.25 | 20.21 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.57 | 132.48 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement