Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs TRAMX
FPBFX vs TRAMX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs TRAMX
FPBFX vs TRAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. TRAMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and TRAMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. TRAMX (106M). TRAMX pays higher dividends than FPBFX: TRAMX (5.31) vs FPBFX (3.41). FPBFX was incepted earlier than TRAMX: FPBFX (40 years) vs TRAMX (19 years). TRAMX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.98). FPBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. TRAMX (43.20). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRAMX: FPBFX (0) vs TRAMX (2500). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.29 vs. TRAMX (4.09). TRAMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.13 vs. FPBFX (23.76).
| FPBFX | TRAMX | FPBFX / TRAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.30 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.75 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.110 | 0.349 | 8,054% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 106M | 1,203% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 5.31 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.29 | 4.09 | 1,034% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.96 | 24.28 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.76 | 39.13 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.35 | 89.29 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers