Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs TRAMX
FPBFX vs TRAMX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs TRAMX
FPBFX vs TRAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. TRAMX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and TRAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. TRAMX (104M). TRAMX pays higher dividends than FPBFX: TRAMX (5.35) vs FPBFX (3.60). FPBFX was incepted earlier than TRAMX: FPBFX (40 years) vs TRAMX (19 years). TRAMX (1.75) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.98). FPBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. TRAMX (43.20). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRAMX: FPBFX (0) vs TRAMX (2500). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.09 vs. TRAMX (2.39). TRAMX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. FPBFX (22.48).
| FPBFX | TRAMX | FPBFX / TRAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.30 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.75 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.173 | -0.785 | -2,823% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 104M | 1,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 5.35 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.09 | 2.39 | 1,303% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.88 | 20.36 | 343% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.48 | 36.70 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.70 | 85.73 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers