Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$41.50
Change-$0.09 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.32B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$9.22
Change-$0.03 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.42M
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. GMIAX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and GMIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. GMIAX (878M). FPCSX (2.95) and GMIAX (2.85) have matching dividends . FPCSX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPCSX (5 years) vs GMIAX (20 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (10.00). GMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: GMIAX (1000000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.80 vs. GMIAX (-4.53).
| FPCSX | GMIAX | FPCSX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.50 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.50 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.106 | 1.878 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 878M | 1,173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 2.85 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | -4.53 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.97 | 9.13 | 317% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 31.56 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement