Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$42.42
Change-$0.40 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.76B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$9.36
Change-$0.11 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets882.18M
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. GMIAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and GMIAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. GMIAX (882M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than GMIAX: FPCSX (3.03) vs GMIAX (2.75). FPCSX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPCSX (5 years) vs GMIAX (20 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (10.00). GMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: GMIAX (1000000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.53 vs. GMIAX (-4.04).
| FPCSX | GMIAX | FPCSX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.50 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.50 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.391 | 3.729 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 882M | 1,224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.03 | 2.75 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.53 | -4.04 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 16.93 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 28.71 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers