Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$45.73
Change+$0.14 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.83B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$10.14
Change+$0.04 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets917.62M
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. GMIAX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and GMIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. GMIAX (918M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: GMIAX (2.67) vs FPCSX (1.92). FPCSX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPCSX (5 years) vs GMIAX (21 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (10.00). GMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: GMIAX (1000000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.94 vs. GMIAX (0.16). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 51.28 vs. GMIAX (29.35).
| FPCSX | GMIAX | FPCSX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.50 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.50 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.575 | 12.186 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 918M | 1,285% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.67 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.94 | 0.16 | 7,566% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.16 | 24.00 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.28 | 29.35 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers