Ad is loading...
FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$39.50
Change+$0.44 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.39B
Nationwide Inv Dest Mod Agrsv R6
Price$8.72
Change+$0.09 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets829.01M
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. GMIAX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and GMIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.4B vs. GMIAX (829M). FPCSX (2.95) and GMIAX (2.85) have matching dividends . FPCSX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPCSX (5 years) vs GMIAX (20 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.50). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.62 vs. FPCSX (14.00). FPCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMIAX: FPCSX (1500) vs GMIAX (1000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.47 vs. GMIAX (-8.14).
| FPCSX | GMIAX | FPCSX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.50 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.50 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.957 | -4.641 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.4B | 829M | 1,255% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 2.85 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | -8.14 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.99 | -3.66 | -464% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 29.02 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -5.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...