Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. GMIAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Hold and GMIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. GMIAX (900M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: GMIAX (4.11) vs FPCSX (2.65). FPCSX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPCSX (6 years) vs GMIAX (22 years). FPCSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.52). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.63 vs. FPCSX (23.00). GMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: GMIAX (1000000) vs FPCSX (100000000). GMIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.08 vs. FPCSX (6.32). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.35 vs. GMIAX (9.84).
| FPCSX | GMIAX | FPCSX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.52 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.52 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.186 | 9.325 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 900M | 1,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 4.11 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | 11.08 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.14 | 20.53 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.35 | 9.84 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement