Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs GMIAX
FPCSX vs GMIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. GMIAX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a StrongBuy and GMIAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. GMIAX (909M). GMIAX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: GMIAX (4.04) vs FPCSX (2.55). FPCSX was incepted earlier than GMIAX: FPCSX (6 years) vs GMIAX (22 years). FPCSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than GMIAX (0.52). GMIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.63 vs. FPCSX (23.00). GMIAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: GMIAX (1000000) vs FPCSX (100000000). GMIAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.01 vs. FPCSX (7.81). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.03 vs. GMIAX (10.08).
| FPCSX | GMIAX | FPCSX / GMIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.52 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.52 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.399 | 12.356 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 909M | 1,419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 4.04 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.81 | 13.01 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.65 | 25.32 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.03 | 10.08 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers