Ad is loading...
FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$43.38
Change+$0.15 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$23.74
Change+$0.11 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FPCSX vs. WSBFX commentary
Nov 08, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. WSBFX (164M). WSBFX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: WSBFX (1.05) vs FPCSX (0.14). FPCSX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPCSX (4 years) vs WSBFX (25 years). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WSBFX (11.76). FPCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: FPCSX (1500) vs WSBFX (100000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. WSBFX (8.07).
| FPCSX | WSBFX | FPCSX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.366 | 8.345 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 164M | 6,463% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.05 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.07 | 8.07 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.07 | -5.68 | -124% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 21.38 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 62.31 | - |