Ad is loading...
FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$38.91
Change+$0.12 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.39B
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$20.97
Change-$0.10 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.44M
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. WSBFX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.4B vs. WSBFX (144M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPCSX (2.95) vs WSBFX (1.36). FPCSX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPCSX (5 years) vs WSBFX (26 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.96). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WSBFX (3.30). FPCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: FPCSX (1500) vs WSBFX (100000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.67 vs. WSBFX (-2.34).
| FPCSX | WSBFX | FPCSX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.96 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.96 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.329 | -5.880 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.4B | 144M | 7,222% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 1.36 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.67 | -2.34 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.83 | -5.24 | -264% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 16.01 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...