Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$43.98
Change-$0.08 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.14B
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$22.95
Change+$0.07 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.46M
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. WSBFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WSBFX (153M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPCSX (1.99) vs WSBFX (1.32). FPCSX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPCSX (5 years) vs WSBFX (26 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.95). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. WSBFX (3.30). WSBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: WSBFX (100000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.07 vs. WSBFX (2.91).
| FPCSX | WSBFX | FPCSX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.95 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.95 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.763 | 2.693 | 363% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 100000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 153M | 7,255% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.32 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.07 | 2.91 | 345% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.18 | 9.62 | 397% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 18.86 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers