Ad is loading...
FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$40.15
Change+$0.18 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$22.44
Change+$0.17 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. WSBFX commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and WSBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. WSBFX (159M). WSBFX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: WSBFX (1.05) vs FPCSX (0.14). FPCSX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPCSX (4 years) vs WSBFX (26 years). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WSBFX (11.76). FPCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: FPCSX (1500) vs WSBFX (100000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.19 vs. WSBFX (4.56).
| FPCSX | WSBFX | FPCSX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.051 | 4.221 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 159M | 6,792% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.05 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | 4.56 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.94 | -5.83 | -239% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 13.70 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers