Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs WSBFX
FPCSX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. WSBFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Hold and WSBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. WSBFX (140M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than WSBFX: FPCSX (2.43) vs WSBFX (1.13). FPCSX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: FPCSX (6 years) vs WSBFX (27 years). FPCSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.94). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. WSBFX (13.34). WSBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: WSBFX (100000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.03 vs. WSBFX (10.21). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.70 vs. WSBFX (7.36).
| FPCSX | WSBFX | FPCSX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.94 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.168 | 5.344 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 100000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 140M | 8,929% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.43 | 1.13 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.03 | 10.21 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.40 | 13.76 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.70 | 7.36 | 240% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers