Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPFZX vs MBPAX
FPFZX vs MBPAX Comparison
Open Charts FPFZX vs MBPAX
FPFZX vs MBPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPFZX vs. MBPAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPFZX is a Hold and MBPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPFZX has more cash in the bank: 656M vs. MBPAX (193M). FPFZX pays higher dividends than MBPAX: FPFZX (3.51) vs MBPAX (2.71). FPFZX was incepted earlier than MBPAX: FPFZX (17 years) vs MBPAX (33 years). MBPAX (1.70) is less costly to investors than FPFZX (0.58). MBPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FPFZX (15.53). MBPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPFZX: MBPAX (1000) vs FPFZX (100000). FPFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. MBPAX (6.90). MBPAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.25 vs. FPFZX (-0.66).
| FPFZX | MBPAX | FPFZX / MBPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.44 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.70 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.713 | 1.465 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 656M | 193M | 340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 2.71 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 6.90 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.65 | 9.89 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.66 | -0.25 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.76 | 11.55 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement