Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPKFX vs RLBCX
FPKFX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FPKFX vs RLBCX
Fidelity Puritan K6
Price$17.10
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.44B
FPKFX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPKFX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPKFX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. FPKFX (2.14B). FPKFX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FPKFX (1.73) vs RLBCX (1.56). FPKFX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FPKFX (6 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FPKFX (0.32). FPKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). FPKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FPKFX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FPKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.30 vs. RLBCX (8.87). FPKFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.46 vs. RLBCX (36.58).
| FPKFX | RLBCX | FPKFX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.89 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.89 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.801 | 9.802 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.56 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.30 | 8.87 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.28 | 28.91 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.46 | 36.58 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement