Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPKFX vs RLBCX
FPKFX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FPKFX vs RLBCX
FPKFX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPKFX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPKFX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FPKFX (2.3B). FPKFX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FPKFX (1.67) vs RLBCX (1.52). FPKFX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FPKFX (7 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FPKFX (0.33). FPKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RLBCX (50.00). FPKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FPKFX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FPKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. RLBCX (8.19). FPKFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.90 vs. RLBCX (30.44).
| FPKFX | RLBCX | FPKFX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.89 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.89 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.382 | 8.814 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 285B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.52 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.64 | 8.19 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.71 | 40.89 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.90 | 30.44 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement