Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPKFX vs RLBCX
FPKFX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FPKFX vs RLBCX
FPKFX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPKFX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPKFX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FPKFX (2.35B). FPKFX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FPKFX (1.63) vs RLBCX (1.52). FPKFX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FPKFX (7 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FPKFX (0.33). FPKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RLBCX (50.00). FPKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FPKFX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FPKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.45 vs. RLBCX (16.29). FPKFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.18 vs. RLBCX (34.25).
| FPKFX | RLBCX | FPKFX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.89 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.89 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.103 | 9.218 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.35B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.52 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.45 | 16.29 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.82 | 42.92 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.18 | 34.25 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement